Game Lab vs Khan Academy JavaScript - What each platform is really good at

Code.org Game Lab and Khan Academy's JavaScript platform are two of the most widely used tools for introducing students to text-based coding. Both are free, both run in the browser, and both have helped millions of students write their first lines of code. But they're not the same tool, and they're not trying to be.

If you're an educator choosing between them — or a student wondering which one to try — here's an honest look at what each platform does best.

Code.org Game Lab: best at structured game building

Game Lab is part of Code.org's CS Discoveries curriculum, and its greatest strength is the tight integration between lessons, activities, and the coding environment.

What Game Lab does well:

• Structured curriculum. Game Lab doesn't just give students a blank canvas. It comes with a carefully designed sequence of lessons that build on each other. If you want a ready-made course where every lesson is planned, Game Lab delivers.
• Sprite-based game development. Game Lab was designed around sprites. Students create characters with createSprite(), move them with velocity and position properties, and detect collisions. The sprite model is intuitive and leads naturally to game projects.
• Teacher dashboard. Code.org provides detailed progress tracking, classroom management tools, and the ability to view student code. For teachers managing 30+ students, this is a significant advantage.
• Guided progression. Students are walked through concepts step by step, with built-in hints, instructions, and validation. Struggling students get scaffolding; advanced students can move ahead.

Where Game Lab falls short:

• 400x400 pixel canvas. The small canvas limits what students can build. Detailed scenes, complex game worlds, and multi-element layouts feel cramped.
• Closed ecosystem. The skills students learn are specific to Code.org's custom API. Functions like drawSprites() and Code.org's event model don't exist outside the platform.
• Limited creative freedom. Because Game Lab is curriculum-driven, open-ended creative exploration can feel like an afterthought. Students follow the lesson more than they follow their curiosity.
• Limited asset library. Students can draw their own sprites in the animation tab, but the built-in options are limited compared to platforms with extensive asset libraries.

Khan Academy JavaScript: best at self-paced learning

Khan Academy's computer programming section takes a different approach. It's built around video tutorials and interactive challenges, using the ProcessingJS library for canvas-based graphics.

What Khan Academy does well:

• Self-paced video instruction. Khan Academy's signature strength is its tutorial model. Students watch short videos, then immediately practice what they learned. For independent learners, this is powerful.
• Instant visual feedback. Students see their code update the canvas in real time as they type. This live preview makes experimentation feel natural and rewarding.
• Low barrier to entry. The platform is simple and focused. There's a code editor, a canvas, and tutorials. No accounts required to start exploring (though accounts enable saving).
• Strong on fundamentals. Khan Academy does an excellent job teaching core concepts — variables, loops, functions, objects — through creative drawing exercises. The progression from "draw a circle" to "animate a scene" is well-designed.

Where Khan Academy falls short:

• ProcessingJS is outdated. Khan Academy's coding platform is built on ProcessingJS, a library that is no longer actively maintained. Students learn syntax and patterns (like draw = function() { }) that don't reflect modern JavaScript conventions.
• 400x400 pixel canvas. Like Game Lab, Khan Academy limits students to a small canvas that restricts the scale of projects.
• No sprite support. Khan Academy has no built-in sprite system. Students who want game characters need to draw everything with shapes or work with images manually. This makes game development significantly harder.
• Limited project scope. There's no multi-scene support, no built-in game assets, and no real framework for building anything beyond single-canvas programs.
• No classroom tools. Khan Academy doesn't offer the teacher dashboards, progress tracking, or classroom management features that Code.org provides.

Head-to-head comparison

Feature	Code.org Game Lab	Khan Academy JS
Language	JavaScript (simplified)	JavaScript (ProcessingJS)
Library status	Code.org maintained	ProcessingJS (unmaintained)
Canvas size	400x400	400x400
Sprite support	Yes	No (draw your own)
Built-in curriculum	Extensive (CS Discoveries)	Video tutorials
Teacher dashboard	Yes	No
Self-paced learning	Somewhat	Excellent
Creative freedom	Moderate	Moderate
Game development	Good	Limited
Modern JS practices	Some	Outdated patterns

Where codeguppy.com fits in

Both Game Lab and Khan Academy are excellent starting points, but students eventually outgrow them. codeguppy.com picks up where both platforms leave off — and in many cases, it's a strong alternative from the start.

What codeguppy.com adds:

• 800x600 canvas — three times the area of either platform, giving students room for detailed, ambitious projects.
• Modern JavaScript on p5.js — students learn an actively maintained, industry-relevant library. Skills transfer directly to the broader JavaScript ecosystem.
• Built-in sprites, backgrounds, and tiles — no need to draw characters from scratch or upload images. Students can create polished-looking games with a single line: sprite("knight", 400, 300).
• Multi-scene support — students can build games with title screens, multiple levels, and game-over screens using showScene(), teaching real software architecture patterns.
• Animation with loop() and clear() — a clean, intuitive animation model that's easy to learn and mirrors professional game loop patterns.
• 100% free, browser-based, no installation — just like Game Lab and Khan Academy, but with more creative headroom.
• Built-in example projects — dozens of complete projects students can study, remix, and extend.

For educators who want a ready-made curriculum, codeguppy.com also offers a Beautifully Illustrated JavaScript Curriculum with 23 lessons, 700+ slides, and 300+ mini-projects available in PowerPoint format — designed for classroom customization.

The bottom line

Choose Code.org Game Lab if you need a structured, standards-aligned curriculum with teacher tools and guided lessons — especially for students with no prior coding experience.

Choose Khan Academy if your students are self-directed learners who thrive with video tutorials and want to explore creative coding at their own pace.

Choose codeguppy.com if you want a modern, flexible platform with a larger canvas, built-in assets, and more creative freedom — whether your students are beginners or ready to go beyond what Game Lab and Khan Academy offer.

All three platforms are free and browser-based. The best choice depends on your students, your teaching style, and how far you want them to go.

Read more blog articles Browse JavaScript projects

About codeguppy

CodeGuppy is a FREE coding platform for schools and independent learners. If you don't have yet an account with codeguppy.com, you can start by visiting the registration page and sign-up for a free account. Registered users can access tons of fun projects!

---

Follow @codeguppy on Twitter for coding tips and news about codeguppy platform. For more information, please feel free to contact us.